In this month’s issue:
City of Berkeley passes Gangjeong Resolution, 2014 base budget issues, Love letter from Afghanistan, Milyang solidarity, Gangjeong Crochet Project, Solidarity from Germany, trial updates, and more!
No War Base on the Island of Peace
For Posts in English
Reblogged with permission from: Alchemy On Jeju Island | by Koohan Paik *
I recently spoke with two members of Veterans for Peace, who had become involved with Korea issues in only the past few years. Each of them came to know Korea through their support for the Gangjeong villagers who have been battling, for nearly eight years straight, construction of a huge, high-tech navy base being built on their Jeju-Island coastline. Both men said that before Jeju, their work with northeast Asia was Japan-centered, and that “no one ever talked about Korea.” But through their engagement with Gangjeong, they have learned about the April 3 massacre, about the unending Korean War, about the unprecedented tonnage of bombs that the U.S. levied upon the Korean people in the early 1950s, and about modern Korean history, in general. Today, they recognize that the Korean War was certainly as consequential in U.S. history as the war in Vietnam. It now perplexes them that Korea had been effectively erased from the books.
The sad truth is, the vast majority of even the most progressive Americans know very little about Korea, let alone that the U.S. has been at war with it for the past 60 years. Many don’t even know where Korea is. This absurd knowledge void presents a challenge so daunting for those working toward unification, that nothing short of alchemy would seem to hold any promise for peace on the peninsula.
On the other hand, it appears that the tragedy unfolding at Gangjeong village might offer just the sort of alchemy that could conjure Korea into the wider consciousness. Ecumenical groups, environmental groups, artists, lawyers, social workers, peace-studies groups, student groups, indigenous-rights groups, and food-sovereignty groups have all passed through the tiny village whose fame is now of global proportion. Numerous articles on the villagers’ plight have been published in Europe, South America, the Asia-Pacific and the U.S. Last summer, I was at the San Francisco airport with Gangjeong’s charismatic Mayor Kang Dong-kyun on his first foray outside of northeast Asia, when a woman behind him in line said, “Aren’t you Mayor Kang? From Gangjeong village?” It turned out she had studied Gangjeong as part of a peace-studies program in Virginia, and recognized him from internet videos. Little Gangjeong has put Korea “on the map” and affirms that the Korean War is indeed alive and well.
Then, in fall of 2013, the City of Berkeley, California, was the first city in the world to formally declare its support of the Gangjeong villagers in the form of a resolution opposing the navy base. Shortly thereafter, in Madison, Wisconsin, the National Board of Veterans for Peace passed a similar resolution to “Stop the Second U.S. Assault on Jeju Island.” The document not only describes what is at stake if the base project is allowed to proceed, but also gives historical context, such as the 1948 genocide on Jeju and how the ever-increasing militarization of Korea violates the 1953 Armistice. It reads like an overview of modern Korean history vis a vis the United States.
One of the most poetic declarations in support of the Jeju struggle was made by a group of Afghani peace activists based in Kabul who have established a Skype relationship with their counterparts in Gangjeong. They write: “We are confident that if ordinary Chinese or North Koreans ever gave you trouble, you would have tea with them, using your imagination and citizen diplomacy to calm the troubles, non-violent paths which are far more effective and kind, and a far better use of tax-payer money (it takes no tax-payer money to drink tea!) than the multi-million premises, personnel and war equipment.”
The global draw of the Gangjeong village struggle owes much to the fact that the land, water, heritage and culture at stake have already garnered international recognition. Gangjeong’s culture and environment have earned UNESCO designations. It is one of Korea’s few remaining traditional, indigenous villages; it contains some of Korea’s best farms and richest soil, its purest water and its haenyo diver tradition; its coast was home to Korea’s only pod of dolphins and one of the world’s finest, soft-coral forests (now being dredged); and its 1,900 residents practice authentic local democracy.
True, all these elements attract an international crowd. But the most enduring appeal of the humble village sits squarely in its remarkable community spirit. The community is comprised of an eclectic mix of villagers, clergy and Seoul activists, who strategize and carry out campaign after campaign. There are cooks, videographers, and kayakers who monitor environmental violations by construction crews. There are people setting up for “Hundred Bows” every morning, or for a music concert in the evening. There are people manning the Peace Center, ready to welcome new arrivals disembarked off the public bus steps away. There are people printing up information pamphlets to disseminate at any one of the big, international conventions that regularly take place on Jeju. It is no exaggeration to say that the village is as fueled on dynamic love as it is by donation.
Most recently, there have been scores of knitters – yes, knitters! – sitting crosslegged in the Peace Center for hours at a time, lashing together enormous woolen quilts in rainbow hues, out of over a thousand knitted squares sent to them by supporters from all over Korea. December 2013 in Gangjeong saw the streets festooned with the quilts, and even the skeletal trees were given cheery, colorful “sweaters” that fit snugly over their trunks and branches. The sight of this whimsical riot of color splashed across winter’s dreary landscape, in contrast with the phalanxes of stern and smooth-faced cops who robotically pull away every protestor from blocking cement trucks, is indeed chilling — yet somehow, transcendent. Even an atheist once commented that life in Gangjeong was the closest one could come to living with God. Maybe that’s why, when visitors return to their own countries, either voluntarily or through deportation, they are compelled, almost evangelically, to “spread the word” through events, writing articles, and making films. Something special is going on in Gangjeong.
But it wasn’t always this way. Initially, the villagers were highly suspicious of outsiders, particularly those from the Korean mainland. They carried the trauma of the April 3, 1948 massacre in living memory, when the South Korean army, under U.S. orders, unleashed wholesale terror on the island and murdered at least a third of the population. Understandably, the South Korean government’s announcement that their village would be the site for a navy base only reinforced their mistrust of outsiders. In those beginning years, the Gangjeong villagers battled alone, in total obscurity. But at a certain point, with everything at stake, they had no choice but to embrace the support of mainlanders who seemed authentically sincere. One such mainlander was artist Sung-hee Choi, board member of the Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space and the pivotal person in exposing the struggle internationally. She started a blog, No base stories of Korea, in December 2008 which first introduced Gangjeong outside of Korea in 2009. Choi moved to Gangjeong in 2010 and has been there ever since.
Update: Environmental Destruction, Incarceration, Depression
Today, almost eight years since the announcement of the base project, the Gangjeong coastline is unrecognizable, carpeted with enormous stacked cement forms of varying shapes and sizes that resemble a giant’s erector set. The 86 species of seaweed and over 500 species of mollusks – once food for the village – have all but perished. The sea is no longer a clear dark blue, but grayish brown. Gargantuan concrete cubes called “caissons,” 10 stories high apiece, sit on the ocean floor where biodiverse coral habitats once thrived. On land, an enormous rebar mold for manufacturing the caissons looms hideously over the horizon. The rumbling and scraping sounds of construction fill the air night and day. The base is slated to start operation in 2015.
To add insult to injury, resistance leaders are jailed for months on end, often caught in a revolving door of multiple prison sentences. Currently, three beloved individuals languish unjustly behind bars: 22-year-old Kim Eun-hye, Brother Park Do-hyun, and film critic Yang Yoon-mo, who has been incarcerated for about a year.
Depression and suicidal tendencies have skyrocketed in Gangjeong, according to the Jeju media. Women weep in the streets. Often, there are scant visitors to boost morale (and the visitors really do make a positive difference). During the winter when it’s off-season for tourists, they feel alone and helpless against the cranes, dredges and cops of the transnational defense industry’s destructive juggernaut.
Community Creativity
Someone once asked Gangjeong Mayor Kang Dong-kyun, “What keeps you going?” He said, “Knowing that this is not just for me, not just for my children, or my children’s children, or for my ancestors. It is for world peace.” But Mayor Kang left out a key component as to how the villagers have maintained their resilience for as long as they have: through dance. As silly as it may sound, a series of four wacky dances that celebrate Gangjeong has served as an indispensable catharsis ritual that ends each day. The villagers will also spontaneously break out into the Gangjeong dances when times get tough, such as what happened upon the tearful announcement at the IUCN convention that a resolution to stop base construction had been defeated. It’s how they let off steam so they can keep going.
In a certain sense, Gangjeong uses creativity as a weapon in psychic self-defense. Once the villagers mounted a film festival of anti-war videos directly in the gaze of a row of riot cops surrounding the base. It is as if, for every harsh blow, every broken bone, every dead dolphin, every prison sentence, and every fine levied upon them, they emerge with a surprising rejoinder of equal, positive force. Recently they lined the village streets with six-foot high stacks of books, 30,000 in all, creating both political art and a library al fresco — a stunning visual juxtaposition against the squadrons of police.
The Gandhi-esque villagers seem to have captured the hearts and imaginations of the world. When a former attorney with the Clinton administration came to Gangjeong, he marveled, “In the face of brutal opposition, they display only grace and persistence.” When a German IUCN bioethicist spent several days in the village, he remarked, “their joy is infectious.” When a Hollywood film director was asked what he liked best about his visit to Gangjeong, he said, “The dancing.” At the core of such astonishing creativity is – again — the community. Perhaps this is the alchemy that can heal all of Korea.
One could say that the villagers have metamorphosed Gangjeong into a premiere destination for political tourism. Gangjeong is an excellent place for foreigners starting at a zero knowledge base, to learn about Korea’s place in history and in the region. And the benefits are reciprocal; while visitors learn about Korea, they invariably take their lessons home and spread the information, which, in turn, supports the movement. Professor Rob Fletcher gave a seminar at Costa Rica’s University for Peace on the base struggle. Victoria Tauli-Corpuz, one of the original drafters of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People, has been in communication with villagers about staking out their identities as indigenous Tamna (which could lead to advantages through processes at the UN). British attorney Harry Jonas wrote a case history of Gangjeong as an example of how legal constructs violate what he calls “natural justice.” Such developments have given new hope to villagers who have lost all faith in their own government.
As a result of such exchanges, villagers have become extraordinarily sophisticated about other Asia-Pacific islands also under assault by militarization and the Pentagon’s “Pacific Pivot.” Solidarity has been built with Taiwan, Okinawa, Guam, Hawaii, and elsewhere. Now, when President Park Geun-hye echoes her father’s dream of turning Jeju into “Korea’s Hawaii,” a tourist mecca complete with navy base, the villagers steadfastly oppose. They do not want to see militarization kill all life in their sea, as it did in Pearl Harbor, which is now a toxic Superfund site. Like all indigenous people, they know that without their natural resources, they die — economically, culturally, spiritually.
Recently, an American pragmatist looked out at the machines bulldozing the coast and said to me, in a defeated tone, “You’re not going to stop the base.” He’s likely right. But maybe I’m not looking only for linear cause-and-effect results – like I used to. The way of life here has connected me with my own humanity and the humanity of others. Just as its residents have transformed this physically disfigured place into a village of spiritual beauty, I, too, have been transformed. And I know many others who have been similarly changed. Gangjeong is like the Chinese character that means not only “crisis,” but also “opportunity.”
Koohan Paik, who was raised in Korea during the Park Chung-Hee era, is a journalist, media educator, and Campaign Director of the Asia-Pacific program at the International Forum on Globalization. In 2011 and 2013, she helped to organize the Moana Nui conference in Honolulu, which brought together international activists, scholars, politicians and artists to consolidate Asia-Pacific discourse as it relates to geopolitics, resource depletion, human rights and global trade. She is the co-author of “The Superferry Chronicles: Hawaii’s Uprising Against Militarism, Commercialism and the Desecration of the Earth,” and has written on militarism in the Asia-Pacific for The Nation, Progressive, and other publications.
*Reblogged posts do not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of Save Jeju Now
Following the passage of a resolution by the City of Berkeley, we have further great news sent to us on Dec. 17:
The motion to Stop The Second U.S. Assault On Jeju Island, Korea passed unanimously in the VfP local chapter. It was then sent to our national office. The National Board unanimously recommended a “Yes” vote, and put it on the agenda for the VfP national meeting in Madison, Wisconsin, in August 2013. The Conventions approved in in a non-binding vote by acclamation. It was then sent out for the mail vote and passed overwhelmingly, 714 Yes to 16 No.
The resolution can be found here.
See the the results of the mail vote here.
Resolution 2013-11: Korea, Stop The Second U.S. Assault On Jeju
See also this related link. Thanks so much, Dr. Hakim for sending this thoughtful and beautiful letter!
To our dear friends on Jeju Island who have involved in your noble struggle at South Korea’s Gangjeong Village,
For seven years I lived in a gorgeous agricultural village in Afghanistan’s Bamiyan Province and like yourselves on Jeju Island, I woke every morning to a window scene of ‘heaven’.
No one with eyes to see such a view would believe that the hell of wars has been occupying this land.
My friends, I imagine you walking the simple yet unpolluted pathways of Gangjeong Village and, should you take a moment’s rest, being caressed and cared for by the tree shadows dappled with sunlight, the chatty play of the neighbourhood children, and the wafts of floral perfume dancing by.
I cannot believe that you, any more than the villagers I lived among in Bamiyan Province, would want to lose such a beautiful and sky-kissed aviary home to the ravages of hatred and greed.
The Afghan Peace Volunteers and I celebrate the love and dedication which has compelled so many of you to stop the construction trucks with your young and old bodies, trucks used to build the military base on your island – we thank you for demonstrating once again that the human spirit can speak to heavy, metallic machines.
Those ‘doing their jobs’ to establish the U.S./South Korea naval base have forgotten their duty to their fellow human beings. Hopefully, they are amenable to the persuasion of your love.
How else can we strengthen ourselves against what seems so massive a force, against the largest and most powerful military in history, except by love?
My 74 year old mother advises, “Don’t be naive or idealistic.”
But I ask myself, “Isn’t it naive or idealistic to think that the peace of Jeju can be promoted by a U.S. /South Korea naval base?”
Naive, idealistic presumptions have to be made in order to support a naval base on Jeju Island. That the U.S. and South Korean governments are ‘good and noble’. That the people of Jeju Island are so ignorant and troublesome they need heavily armed forces to civilize them. That China and North Korea are so ‘evil’ that a base at Jeju is needed to ‘contain’ them.
How wonderful to find these presumptions being dismissed upon examination, to hear the people of Gangjeong Village say, “We don’t want a base in our heavenly home!“
We are confident that if ordinary Chinese or North Koreans ever gave you trouble, you would have tea with them, using your imagination and citizen diplomacy to calm the troubles, non-violent paths which are far more effective and kind, and a far better use of tax-payer money (it takes no tax-payer money to drink tea!) than the multi-million premises, personnel and war equipment.
Such is the priceless power of humane relationships!
In 2003, I lived in Quetta, Pakistan and did medical humanitarian work among Afghan refugees. There were many suspicious characters in alleyways using satellite phones to arrange their smuggling operations, and there were those said to be the ‘Taliban’.
One day, I was invited by a student whose brother was a Talib. Yes, presumptions did flash through my mind, about the Talib brother ‘finishing the infidel off’. The opposite was true. I was hosted to a sumptuous meal, “shlombe” which is a milk-yoghurt drink, and a warm conversation. Would this human-to-human interaction have been possible over a machine-gun, under the visor of an army helmet.
This everyday truth, reaffirmed daily by Afghan friends who have loved me through their hospitality and protection, has convinced me that if the 99% of every country would befriend the 99% of every other country, we would be well on the way to discarding all weapons, including nuclear weapons. How’s that for a Global Disarmament Treaty?
On a small but significant scale, this happens among those of the North and South Korean 99% who cross the U.S.-drawn 38th parallel to reunite with one another in tears. It has happened between ordinary Iranians and Israelis during the Love and Peace Campaign.
Osama Bin Laden cited opposition to U.S. military bases in Saudi Arabia as a main motive behind his group’s attacks on September 11th. So,another thought, for thoughts are merely dreams yet unfulfilled. If those people staying around the U.S.’ 750 overseas military bases said, peacefully, “No!” and compelled the Pentagon to close the bases, how many future tragedies might be averted?
We look at the 9 existing military bases in Afghanistan, intended to be kept for ‘exclusive’ U.S. military use through 2024 and beyond if the U.S./Afghan Bilateral Security Agreement is successfully pushed through under U.S. threats. You look at the naval base being constructed on Jeju Island which is named the World island of Peace, and what our senses and our understanding show us is a global 1% in government and corporations attempting to ‘comfort’ the 99% with claims that they care about our homes, our livelihoods, and our desire to live without wars, when in practice, they pursue profit and power at our expense.
You see the Jeju shoreline being cordoned off as if to imprison the island, and one of you, Dr Park, used to swim along the shore every day to free it, until they put him behind bars, where he can’t swim. We see the bare, deforested land and hills of Afghanistan beneath its mountains, destroyed and neglected by nations insistent on waging wars.
You see the 16.5% poor of the ‘Dragon’ South Korean population, and a test-obsessed, economic-geared education system that has contributed to South Korea having the highest suicide rate among 31 OECD countries. We see labourers standing jobless in the streets of Kabul, some going back to makeshift houses to shiver in the autumn cold, and some resorting to drugs under the smelly, trash-packed river bridges.
You see soldiers, police, batons, shields. We see them everywhere too, even militarizing ‘humanitarian’ aid.
All of these sights make it so socially essential for us to remain friends, to stand and struggle together for a while or for a lifetime, free in our minds and hearts from borders, and free from the scourge of fear. That’s why the Afghan Peace Volunteers are petitioning for 2 Million Voices.
Beyond the U.S. military’s hopes of completing Jeju’s one naval base and Afghanistan’s nine are struggles by people in Okinawa, in Diego Garcia and on and on, people we commit to befriending across borders, persisting in building those person-to-person and community-to-community relationships so necessary to saving our world from militarism, from life as machines, from fear.
Thank you for your work of love, and for speaking with me and Abdulhai, Ali, Raz Mohammad, Ghulamai, Faiz, Zekerullah and Baraththis past October.
We’ll have to keep in touch.
With human solidarity from Afghanistan,
Dr Hakim with the Afghan Peace Volunteers
http://globaldaysoflistening.org
Update, Dec. 11 from U.S. peace activists:
‘The historic vote on Jeju will be celebrated in a press conference at 6:30 PM on December 17 at Berkeley Old City Hall steps, 2134 MLK Jr. Way, Berkeley 94704
Hope you can attend the event!
Phoebe Sorgen hopes you can stay and push for passage of Fukushima resolution as well.’
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DECEMBER 11
Berkeley joins Steinem stone in seeking Justice 4 Jeju.
Contacts:
Paul Liem: 510-414-5575 pliem@mindspring.com
KJ Noh: k.j.noh48@gmail.com
Christine Ahn: christineahn@mac.com
Stephanie Miyashira: 524-2624
Council member Max Anderson: 981-7130
Councilmember Kriss Worthington: (510) 981-7170 / kworthington@cityofberkeley.infoBerkeley made history by becoming the first City in a growing international movement of environmentalists and peace activists to stand up for villagers on Jeju Island in their long struggle to oppose a massive naval base being built on the beautiful island.
Gloria Steinem emailed the Berkeley City Council: “…There are some actions for which those of us alive today will be judged in centuries to come. The only question will be: What did we know and when did we know it? I think one judgment-worthy action may be what you and I do about the militarization of Jeju Island, South Korea, in service of the arms race.”
Jeju Island is UNESCO’s only triple honoree: a Global Geological Park, a Biosphere Reserve, and a World Heritage Site. This environmental jewel was designated an “Absolute Conservation Area” by the Korean Government, was proclaimed an “Island of Peace”, and voted one of the “New Seven Wonders of the World.”
Affected local villagers have engaged in seven years of principled non-violent struggle, facing endless beatings, arrests, fines, and imprisonment. Most recently, Sister Stella Soh, the first Catholic Nun in Korean history to be arrested for an act of conscience, was arraigned in a Korean court.
Stephanie Miyashira, an activist in a wheel chair, broke down in tears as she implored the council to support the cause of peace. She agreed with Oliver Stone, who stated : “I deplore the militarization of Jeju Island. I deplore the building of the base. This is leading up to a war, and we cannot have another war here. We have to stop this thing.”
Christine Ahn, a scholar at the Korea Policy Institute, wrote in a heartfelt and moving letter to Berkeley City Council that she had named her daughter Jeju because of her passion for the cause of the peace activists on the island.
Berkeley’s Resolution calls on the US Military “to cease supporting the base which will gravely harm the fragile ecology, damage the livelihood of the people of Jeju, and make this Island of Peace a pawn of the great powers and a magnet for military conflict.”
This great news was recently shared by our devoted peace activists friends in the United States. We so thank to peace-loving citizens in the United States who greatly contributed to passing this resolution. Below you can find a write up of the events surrounding the passing of the resolution. You can also see the whole account and resolution together here. You can find the officially signed City Council resolution at the bottom of this post.
Berkeley City Council passes Strong Resolution support South Koreans Resisting Navy Base on Jeju Island
On Jeju Island, an environmental jewel sixty miles south of the Korean Peninsula, a massive naval base is being built to house US warships, submarines and aircraft carriers, serving as a key forward base for the “US Pacific Pivot”, and turning the region into a hair trigger for global confrontation. Seven years of principled non-violent struggle by the affected villagers have resulted mostly in endless beatings, arrests, fines, imprisonment; a growing international solidarity movement; but little tangible in the way of political support from any national or local government.
On December 3rd, 2013, the City Council of Berkeley, voted to support the Peace and Justice Commission’s Resolution in support of the residents of Jeju Island and to End US support for construction of the Jeju Naval Base. This makes it the first city in the world to formally declare its support of the Jeju Islanders and its opposition to the base.
Despite being stripped out of the consent calendar and placed almost at the bottom of the council agenda–usually procedural maneuvers designed to kill or impede passage–the resolution ultimately passed (with 5 votes in favor and 4 abstentions) in the Berkeley City Council. Council member Kriss Worthington, who had sponsored and fast-tracked the resolution, tabled the two items preceding the resolution, allowing it to be put to discussion and a vote, minutes before the clock ran out.
Huge popular support, an unusually vibrant and vocal group of speakers who stayed late into the night–waiting for over 4 hours for the opportunity to address the council for a single brief minute–and a massive flurry of emails from concerned individuals all over the country may have influenced the final vote.
Motivated activists from Starr King School, Pacific Lutheran Seminary, from the Berkeley Fellowship of Unitarian Universalists, the Peace and Justice Commission, the Ecumenical Peace Institute, and others made passionate, informed pleas for support of the resolution. An activist in a wheel chair broke down in tears as she implored the council to support the cause of peace.
Also significant was a letter from Christine Ahn, a scholar at the Korea Policy Institute and peace activist, who wrote in a heartfelt and moving letter that she had named her daughter Jeju because of her passion for the cause of the peace activists on the island.
An earlier version of the resolution had previously been shot down in February by the Council. Even as it was drafted by the commission, Thyme Siegel of the Peace and Justice Commission had stated, with a straight face, “It is not our business to tell the South Korean government and military how to defend itself against North Korea and China.”—a howler of ignorance or disingenuousness, refuted by the history of constant, unwanted, and heavy-handed US intervention and influence in the country since its inception, including the original massacre of 30,000-80,000 civilians on Jeju Island; and the continuous history of threat, provocation, and escalation in the area.
Council Member Linda Maio attempted to water down the resolution by stripping out references to the Pacific Pivot (despite corroborating statements from the Secretary of State and Defense); references to toxic dumping in bases in the Phillipines, and rapes and violence in Okinawa, (as well as missile tests in the Marshall Islands and drone bases in Australia). In particular, Council Member Maio stated, “Condemning the U.S Military for rapes–I can’t put it in there”, apparently oblivious to the fact that 22,000 rapes and sexual assaults occur within the military annually, a number that itself pales in comparison with the abuse that is dealt out to the general population by an occupying military immunized from local prosecution by Status of Forces Agreements.
She also removed information regarding the hardware being deployed (the US Navy’s Aegis Combat System).
Council Member Max Anderson, a war veteran, however, put paid to her statement, stated that he had been in Okinawa as a marine, and had witnessed first hand the abuses, the rapes, the violence, and ugliness of the military occupation.
Council Member Gordon Wozniak mentioned the recent escalation of hostilities in the pacific with Air Defense Zones, stating that “it was not just about Korea, that it was Japan, China”, and that the supporters of the resolution were “missing the point” [in focusing on Korea]. He did not seem understand that he had just proven the argument of the supporters, that the Jeju base was part of the general escalation of hostilities and projection of force in the pacific, and that its presence would exacerbate regional conflict.
Ultimately, what may have swung the vote may have been a missive from Gloria Steinem, legendary feminist icon and supporter of Jeju, addressing the city council:
“As you cast your votes about Jeju’s future, I hope you will consider the attached”, referring to her article in the New York times where she had written, “There are some actions for which those of us alive today will be judged in centuries to come. The only question will be: What did we know and when did we know it? I think one judgment-worthy action may be what you and I do about the militarization of Jeju Island, South Korea, in service of the arms race.”
Here is the officially signed City Resolution on Jeju, which can also be found at the Berkeley City Council website:
35. End U.S. Support for Construction of the Jeju Naval Base
From: Councilmember Worthington
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution urging the United States to cease its support for the construction of Jeju Naval Base in South Korea to preserve the island’s fragile biodiversity and honor the island’s past history of bloodshed. Copies of the resolution to be sent to Congresswoman Barbara Lee and Senator Dianne Feinstein and Senator Barbara Boxer, President Barack Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry, and U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, and Republic of Korea President Park Geun-hye.
Financial Implications: None
Contact: Kriss Worthington, Councilmember, District 7, 981-7170
Action: 12 speakers. M/S/C (Worthington/Arreguin) to adopt Resolution No. 66,405 –N.S. amended to delete the fifth and seventh Whereas clauses.
Vote: Ayes – Maio, Moore, Anderson, Arreguin, Worthington; Noes – None; Abstain – Capitelli, Wozniak, Bates; Absent – Wengraf.
Action: M/S/Failed (Worthington/Arreguin) to suspend the rules and extend the meeting to 11:30 p.m.
Vote: Ayes – Maio, Anderson, Arreguin, Worthington; Noes – Capitelli, Wozniak; Abstain – Moore, Bates; Absent – Wengraf.
‘An air force general in the reserve saying that “A FIGHTER HEAVILY EQUIPPED WITH ARMS cannot load many arms for long distance (* here, to the Ieodo in the south of Jeju) because its operation radius cannot but be narrowed, “ stated that, ‘however, with air oil feeder, the problems can be solved[..].”
He also proposed as an alternative to BUILD AN AIR FORCE BASE in the vicinity of the naval base currently being constructed in the Jeju region.”
(Financial News, Nov. 26, 2013, excerpt translation, article fwd by Go Yu Gi)
His remarks follow the citations of the military personnel and experts who say that the current ROK air fighters are short of numbers and operation radius to fly to the Ieodo. The only available kinds of F-15 or KF-16 can saty on the sky of the Iedo only for 20 minutes, they say. The article is above all on the need of strengthening ROK air force; additional purchase of advanced fighters, introduction of air oil feeders, and base-building. The whole argument occurs with the need of including the Ieodo in the Korean Air Defense Identification Zone, since the China declaration on her ADIZ (Air Defense Identification Zone) on Nov. 23 in which she put the Ieodo, as well as the Senkaku(Dayou) Islands. Recently on Nov. 27, the South Korea Ministry of National Defense decided to purchase four air oil feeders from 2017 to 2019. The operation time would be extended to one hour then. Boeing KC-767 is one of the candidates. See the article here.
As well known, the key issue of the recently declared China Air Defense Identification zone lies in the Senkaku(Dayou) Islands that is claimed both by Japan and China (and possibly in the Yonaguni Islands between Taiwan and Japan). However, for the Koreans, the hot issue lies in the matter of the Ieodo. The Ieodo, the word originally comes from the word, ‘Ieodo’ which meant by the Jeju natives an imaginary Island, a ‘paradise.’ However, in reality, it is not an Island but a submerged ‘rock’ 149 km distant from the Korea-southern tip of the Marado (Island) located southward from the Jeju Island. It is known that the underwater of the Ieodo area is rich in resource: about 100 billion barrel crude oil and 7.2 billion ton natural gas at maximum. The Ieodo, though Koreans emotionally consider it as their own, has not been included in the Korean Air Defense Identification Zone which was drawn by the US military in 1951– but under the Japanese Air Defense Identification Zone, despite the Korean government’s demand on it. For more details, please refer to the reference links here
Korea has set up a maritime science research center on the rock, considering it as her own district sea area, despite the fact that a rock cannot be regarded as an element for territorial waters. The issue has lied on not territory but on the EEZ (Exclusive economic Zone).Anyway, because the Ieodo is put in the JDAIZ, Korea has made requests to Japan whenever she needed to fly to the Ieodo. Now with the China’s claim on her ADIZ on Nov. 23, the Ieodo is fated to be put between the overlapped ADIZs of Japan and China. The South Korean government is currently attempting to put the Ieodo in her ADIZ, though late. See theYonhap News article on Nov. 29.
To consider together of the currently disputed air defense identification zone and the Jeju naval base, one may remember the remarks on Oct. 18, 2012 by Kim Jae-Yoon, a member of the National defense Committee of the National Assembly and a member of the Jeju-based Democratic Party. He claimed in the National Assembly inspection on the ROK navy headquarter at the time, that “the cause that the Jeju naval base is necessary for the protection of south sea area is suspected to be merely a show.” He said the reason, “it is because the navy’s operation in the south sea area would be limited by the JADIZ (Japanese Air Defense Identification Zone), even though the navy has stated that the purpose to build the Jeju naval base lies in effective supervision and protection on the south sea area and sea lane.’ Kim pointed out that:‘While the Korea Air Defense Identification Zone( KADIZ) is set close to the Jeju island, the Japanese Air Defense Identification Zone (JADIZ) is set below the south sea of the Jeju and the Ieodo also belongs to the JADIZ.’ For more on this, see here.
His remark was, in fact, very likely to be much helped by the resource collected by the Gangjeong Village Association who prepared in September, 2011, for the national Assembly inquiry.
The current dispute on the air defense identification zone refreshingly reminds also that Korean military is subordinating to the United States and Japan military under the name of the ROK-US-Japan trilateral alliance. It also stresses not only that Korea, especially Jeju has to wisely maintain its balance sense amidt the conflict between the United States/ Japan and China but also in the critical role to contribute to the peace of the north east Asia. The weakest has the key, you might say.
Though it might be a casual proposal, the idea of building an air force base in the Peace Island is dangerous, adding to our concern about the possibility of militarization of Jeju.
To see the map, the overlapped area of ADIZs among China, Japan, and Korea could be an interesting area. It depends on the people keenly related to the area whether the overlapped zone, known to be resource-rich area would be the field of conflict or co-existing peace. You can see more maps here.
Dr. Song Kang-Ho who has been imprisoned for his opposing activities against the Jeju naval base project for the 3rd time was released on bail on Nov. 29, after 151 prison days. On Nov. 27, the court made a decision of bail on Br. Park Do-Hyun and Dr. Song Kang-Ho. Both had been illegally and unjustly arrested together on July 1, this year. Both refused to be bailed out as the court decision was seemingly too intentionally late and it would not stop them their opposing activities. However, as people strongly urged Dr. Song to be released from jail and paid bailing fee on be half of him without his knowledge, he was eventually released.
Dr. Song Kang-Ho was briefly imprisoned for two weeks in 2011 and jailed again in 2012. In his second imprisonment last year, he lived in jail for 181 days. He leads the Save Our Sea Team, a citizens’ monitoring team opposing the naval base project.
Update: Dr. Song Kang-Ho was released on Nov. 29. Please see here. And Mr. Kang Bu-Eon was released on Dec. 3.
Regis Tremblay, a movie director of ‘The Ghosts of Jeju,’ thankfully made these images for the English speakers. Bruce Gagnon writes in his blog:
“These good people are right now languishing inside the jail house on Jeju Island, South Korea. And there are more on the way.
Their crime? Trying to non-violently block the construction vehicles from entering the Navy base “destruction” site in Gangjeong village. In the case of Yang Yoon-Mo he got an 18 month sentence. And many people are being given severe fines to pay.
One activist from Hawaii, who spent considerable time in Gangjeong village in solidarity with the villagers, has reported: “There is no heat for male prisoners (I do not know about the women’s section of the jail) during the frigid months of winter. The conditions are inhumane.”
We can’t ever forget these good people who are fighting for peace, the environment, and human rights. See more at the official Jeju web site Save Jeju Now.‘
# Among the five, Mr. Kang Bu-Eon is a village elder, who has spent lots of time in his childhood on the Gureombi Rock. He had taken care of his sick wife who fell down for a stroke eight years ago. He himself takes four medicines for illness.
On Oct. 22, some people in Gangjeong had the chance to talk with Afghanistan peace volunteers through skype interview. See the link here. The talk was thanks to the bridge efforts by Regis Tremblay, Kathy Kelly, and Hakim Young. Many of the Afghanistan Peace Volunteers are youths and they are eager to have peace talk with the youths in Gangjeong as well.
Recently, they sent a short moving solidarity message for Sr. Soh Stella who stood in the court despite her ill health on Nov. 14, for her opposing activities against the Jeju naval base project. It is for the 1st time in the 200 years of Korean Catholic history that a Catholic nun stands in the court. Here are their message sent:
سلام
تشکر از شجاعت شما ما خبر شدیم که شما ازخا طر اعتراض به پا یګاه نظامی همرای
دولت دعوه دارد.
ما جوانان رضاکار صلح همرای شما هستیم.
محبت
همرای
شما
Dear Sister Stella,
Salam!
Thank you for your courage. We know you have a court trial as a result of your protests against the U.S. military base, [in content].
We, the youth of the Afghan Peace Volunteers are with you!
Love, with you,
The Afghan Peace Volunteers
(* The Jeju naval base project is officially called the South Korean base. However, as many critics have pointed out, the base would serve in fact, for the US purpose of ‘Asia Pivot.’)
An Afghan peace volunteer, Faiz, said in the skype interview as the below: (See the link)
‘The mainstream media has generally given the impression that there would be a withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan in 2014, and that the war will wind down. There won’t be a withdrawal. The U.S. military is not withdrawing from Afghanistan. Instead, the U.S. and Afghan governments are currently negotiating the Bilateral Security Agreement , which would establish the long term presence of U.S. troops on at least nine military bases across Afghanistan , and which would grant legal immunity to U.S. soldiers.’
‘We understand that the South Korean soldiers have no choice. Likewise, U.S. soldiers need their jobs to earn a living. How difficult it is for them psychologically, doing something they’re not willing to do; 22 U.S. veterans commit suicide every day!‘
Afghanistan has suffered from the attack by the United States and NATO forces since Oct. 7, 2001. We hope our peace talks would be a part of hope and dream a peaceful world without war. The youths in Afghanistan also want to have talks with many people in the world through the Global Listening program.
End Afghanistan Occupation
No Syria Attack
Stop the Drones Surveillance & Killing
No Missile Defense
No to NATO Expansion
No Nuclear Power in Space or on Earth
End Corporate Domination of Foreign/Military Policy
Convert the Military Industrial Complex
(Slogan source: Keep Space for Peace Week)
# Korean version is here.